Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
| April Davis |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2015cv00766 |
| April 8, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/11/2016 ORDERING Plaintiff's 16 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Commissioner's 25 cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and judgment is ENTERED for the Commissioner. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/25/16 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The New due date will be 3/25/2016. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/2016 GRANTING 17 Defendants first extension of time; defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment is CONTINUED to 2/24/2016. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/22/15: Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to December 24, 2015. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/2/15 ORDERING for good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to December 18, 2015. All case deadlines are adjusted accordingly. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/20/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted; Service of process is appropriate for the Commissioner of Social Security;The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases; The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the US Marshal; Within 14 days Plaintiff shall submit service documents to the US Marshal and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. (cc: USM) (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: April Davis | |
| Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
