Kappen v. McDonald et al
| Kurt F. Kappen |
| Robert A. McDonald and Leigh A. Bradley |
| 2:2015cv00901 |
| April 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/29/2015. In light of 6 Notice, this action is DISMISSED, all scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED, and Clerk shall CLOSE this file. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/20/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. Service of the complaint is appropriate for defendant United States Department of Veterans Affairs only. Named defe ndants Robert A. McDonald and Leigh A. Bradley shall NOT be served with process. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue forthwith all process. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, this court's scheduling order , and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the United States Marshal. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
