Graves v. United States Marshall Office et al
Peter Graves |
United States Marshall Office, Department of Justice, Eric Holder, Richardson, Pronechen and Stacia Hylton |
2:2015cv01135 |
May 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
William B. Shubb |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/4/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute; REFERRING this matter to Judge William B. Shubb; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen days. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/24/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice; and plaintiff is given 20 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint if he can do so consistent with this order. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/31/2017 GRANTING 3 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed informa pauperis; RECOMMENDING that plaintiffs complaint be dismissed without leave to amend and the Clerk be directed to close this case; Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.