Dougherty et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty |
| Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv01226 |
| June 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/12/18, ORDERING that all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 12/28/2018. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 2/28/2019. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 6/27/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
86
AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/15/2018 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall release the bond payments paid by Plaintiffs Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty totaling $15,300.00 to Plaintiffs Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty with a check payable to Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty in the amount of $15,300.00. (cc: financial). (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
84
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/7/2018 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court shall release the bond payments paid by Plaintiffs Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty totaling $15,300 to Plaintiffs Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty with a check payable to Penny Dougherty and Dennis Dougherty in the amount of $15,000. (cc: Financial) (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
79
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/16/18: Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/29/18. The Court hereby DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third and Sixth claims 45 and the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fifth claim, with leave to amend Plaintiff's IIED claim as to this Defendant within 21 days of the date of this Order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/18. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third and Fifth Causes of Action 43 . The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' leave to amend within 30 days of the date of this Order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/1/2017 GRANTING 65 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; ENJOINING the defendants from conducting a trustee's sale or foreclosure of the property located at 5130 Fruitvale Road, Newcastle, Califo rnia 95658 until resolution of this action or further order of the Court; ORDERING the plaintiffs to deposit $1,700.00 with the Clerk of Court on the first business day of each month, to be held in bond until resolution of this action or further order of the Court. (cc: Financial) (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 54 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/17/17. The Court hereby issues a Temporary Restraining Order that shall prohibit Defendants Select Portfolio Se rvicing, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and all of its agents from conducting a Trustees Sale of the Property located at 5130 Fruitvale Road, Newcastle, California 95658. The Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in place until the Court rules on Plaintiffs' MOTION for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs' shall file and appropriately notice their MOTION within fourteen (14) days of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/01/2016 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 28 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 30 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant BOA's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to COUNT I, COUNT II, COUNT IV, and COUNT VI; and GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND with respect to COUNT III and COUNT V. Defendant Wells and SPS' Motion to Dismiss is ruled upon as follows: With respect to COUNT I and COUNT II against Wells, the mo tion is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. With respect to COUNT I and II against SPS, the motion is DENIED. With respect to COUNTS IV and VI against Wells and SPS, the motion is DENIED. With respect to COUNTS III and V against Wells and SPS, the motion is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
