Blocker v. Soto
Petitioner: Joshua Blocker
Respondent: J. Soto
Case Number: 2:2015cv01416
Filed: July 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/24/18 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 3/9/17, are ADOPTED in full; Respondent's 10/7/15 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations; and the court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C.§ 2253. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/2017 ORDERING 45 Petitioner's request, construed as a request for appointment of counsel, is DENIED without prejudice; and Petitioner is GRANTED 60 days from the date of this order in which to file objections to 37 Findings and Recommendations. No further extensions of time will be granted. (Reader, L)
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/09/17 vacating 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Also, RECOMMENDING that respondent's motion to dismiss 13 be granted; and this action be dismissed. MOTION to DISMISS 13 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
July 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/7/16 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, respondent shall file a response to petitioners objections, including copies of pertinent mental health records for the relevant time frame; and within 21 days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply(Dillon, M)
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/10/16 RECOMMENDING that respondents motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) be granted; and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/23/15 ORDERING that petitioner show cause, within 30 days, why his failure to oppose respondents October 7, 2015 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blocker v. Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua Blocker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?