Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.
Plaintiff: Kasey F. Hoffmann
Defendant: Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, Dean F. Growden, Julie Bustamante and Lassen County
Case Number: 2:2015cv01558
Filed: July 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/2/2018 ADOPTING IN FULL 130 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 127 Motion to Consolidate Cases. (Michel, G.)
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/26/2018 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Kasey F. Hoffman at 8:30 a.m. on 10/22/2018 in Courtroom 6. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD) (Henshaw, R)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 130 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/14/18 RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to consolidate 15-1526 and 1558 for trial 127 be denied. Motion 127 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
July 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/25/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 124 request for disclosure of pretrial conference proceedings. (Yin, K)
March 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/15/2018 ORDERING plaintiff's request to name new witnesses, contained in his supplemental pretrial statement, is GRANTED; the pretrial order is AMENDED to identify the following additional witnesses for plaintiff: Roger Stephens, Dr. Fithian, Monique Agee, Michelle McGee, Keith Stewart, Dena Adams, Michele Spillers, Sergeant Grey, John Minaue and Dean Growden. Plaintiff's request for the court to order the US Marshal to serve su bpoenas on his witnesses, contained in his supplemental pretrial statement, is DENIED. Plaintiff's request to supplement his exhibit list, contained in his supplemental pretrial statement, is GRANTED; the pretrial order is AMENDED to include th e additional exhibits identified by plaintiff in his supplemental pretrial statement. Plaintiff's 112 motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff's 113 motion for the US Marshal to serve subpoenas is DENIED. The Clerk shall file UNDER SEAL all exhibits attached to plaintiff's supplemental pretrial statement, i.e., ECF No. 110 at 10-41. (Yin, K)
October 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/3/2017 DENYING 97 Motion requesting referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program and scheduled for a settlement conference. (Henshaw, R)
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/12/17 95 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 65 is DENIED. Defendants' MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 81 is DENIED as to Plaintiff's First Amendment claim against defendant Jones and GRANTED in all other respects. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/12/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 68 motion for seizure of assets is DENIED; plaintiff's 69 motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery is DENI ED; plaintiff's 73 motion for summary judgment, construed as an opposition to defendants' motion for an extension of time, is DENIED; plaintiff's 84 motion for punitive damages, construed as motion for leave to amend, is DENIE D. IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's 65 motion for summary judgment be denied; defendants' 81 motion for summary judgment be denied as to plaintiff's First Amendment claim against defendant Jones and granted in all other respects. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
December 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/12/16 denying 60 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's opposition to the videotaped deposition 63 is denied. (Plummer, M)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/12/16 DENYING 56 Motion for issuance of subpoenas. (Dillon, M)
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/23/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 53 , 55 requests for subpoenas. (Yin, K)
August 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/24/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 35 motion for a partial settlement. (Yin, K)
August 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/10/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/27/16 33 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for damages under RLUIPA; Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS is DENIED in all other respects. Defendants shall file an answer to the complaint within twenty days of the date of this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/27/16 DISREGARDING 28 Motion for Discovery. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Dillon, M)
May 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/26/16 RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17 ) be granted as to plaintiff's claims for damages under RLUIPA; defendants' motion to dismiss should be denied in all other respects. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/15/2016 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/29/16 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause for his failure to file an opposition to defendants motion to dismiss; plaintiff shall also file his opposition within that time; failure to respond to this order will result dismissal of this action.(Dillon, M)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/19/2015 DISMISSING plaintiff's amended complaint with 30 days to file a second amended complaint; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff a civil rights complaint form.(Yin, K)
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/29/15 ORDERING that Sheriff of Lassen County to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Kasey F. Hoffman to the c lerk until the balance of $350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Lassen County. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kasey F. Hoffmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lassen Adult Detention Facitity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean F. Growden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie Bustamante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lassen County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?