Dittmar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Abigail P Dittmar
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2015cv01630
Filed: July 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Shasta
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/26/17 GRANTING 25 Motion for Attorney Fees; plaintiff is awarded $5,166.93 in attorney fees; Defendant is directed to determine whether plaintiff's EAJA attorneys fees are subject to any offset permitted under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program and, if the fees are not subject to an offset, shall cause payment of fees to be made directly to plaintiff unless the Government decides to accept the assignment of fees; and defendant is directed to mail the payment to plaintiff's counsel. (Benson, A.)
March 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/07/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; defendant's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/02/16 ORDERING that defendant's date to respond to 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 06/30/16. (Benson, A)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/03/2016 EXTENDING the deadline for Defendant to file the Certified Administrative Record (CAR) from 3/02/16 to 4/01/16. (Jackson, T)
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/12/2015 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Application to proceed informa pauperis; The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigned's Scheduling Or der and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment for socialsecurity cases; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order upon the United States Marshal; Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons, a completed USM-285 form, Within 5 days after submitting the necessary documents to the USM for service or process, plaintiff shall file in this court a declaration stating the date on which the documents were submitted to the USM; The USM is directed to serve process and copies of the undersigned's Scheduling Order and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dittmar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abigail P Dittmar
Represented By: Young Chul Cho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?