Ervine v. Davis
| Dennis Newton Ervine |
| Ron Davis |
| 2:2015cv01916 |
| September 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Death Penalty |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/3/2024 GRANTING 73 Motion for Extension of Time. On or before 5/17/2024, petitioner shall file a response to 72 Motion to Dismiss. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/06/2024 GRANTING 70 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent to file any Motion to Dismiss on or before 03/20/2024. (Murphy, J)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 02/21/2024 GRANTING 67 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent shall file Motion to Dismiss by 3/6/2024.(Lopez, K)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/18/24 GRANTING 65 respondent's motion for extension of time. Respondent shall file any motion to dismiss by 2/21/24. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/5/2018 ADOPTING 54 Findings and Recommendations in full. Petitioner's 37 Motion for Stay/Abeyance is GRANTED. Respondent's 33 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Petitioner is ORDERED to file a notice with this Court within thirty days of a decision by the California Supreme Court on his exhaustion petition. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
54
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/9/2018 RECOMMENDING 37 Motion to Stay be granted and 33 Motion to Dismiss be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
52
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/14/2017 CONTINUING the 37 Motion to Stay Hearing to 1/5/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/26/2017 GRANTING respondent's 45 motion for a continuance. The hearing on petitioner's 37 Motion to Stay and Abeyance is CONTINUED to 12/15/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Respondent's opposition is due on 11/3/2017 and any reply brief is due on 11/10/2017. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/7/2017 STRIKING the 7/28/2017 stipulation from the record; and the court finds good cause for respondent's 41 unopposed motion for extension of time and CONFIRMS the dates set out in the 7/31/2017 order. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/31/2017 GRANTING 41 Motion to Continue Hearing on Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance and Modify Briefing Schedule. Hearing on Petitioner's Motion for Say and Abeyance continued to 10/20/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Opposition due on 9/22/2017 and any reply brief due on 9/29/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/09/17 as to 37 MOTION to STAY ( Motion Hearing continued to 8/11/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes.) Respondents opposition to the motion for stay and abeyance is due on July 21, 2017 and petitioners reply is due July 28, 2017. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/06/16 granting in part 23 Motion for Protective Order. Within five days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a copy of exhibit 290 with the jurors name redacted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal exhibits 290-301 to the petition. Within five days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall serve copies of exhibits 291-301 on respondent, subject to the protective order set out in paragraph 2, belo w. By January 31, 2017, respondent shall file and serve a motion to dismiss or other pleading responsive to the petition. Within thirty days of service of the motion, petitioner shall file an opposition. Within fifteen days thereafter, respondent shall file any reply. The court will schedule oral argument if necessary. (See order for further details). (Plummer, M) Modified on 10/7/2016 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/16/15 ORDERING that Respondents November 5, 2015 Request to Seal is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal respondents November 5, 2015Request to Seal Documents and CD and respondents Proposed Order Sealing LodgedDocuments. The Clerk is directed to lodge under seal the appropriate documents and CD (see order for details).(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/16/15 ORDERING that by August 19, 2016, petitioner shall file the petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By November 6, 2015, respondent shall file a Notice of Lodging and lodge with the court the state court record (see order for details). (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/21/15 ORDERING that the Office of the Federal Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, is appointed to representpetitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 3599. See Local Rule 191(c). On October 16, 2015 at 9:3 0 a.m., the undersigned will hold a case management conference. Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal the Selection Boards September 14, 2015 letter to the undersigned. In addition to serving this order upon counsel, the Clerk is directed to serve it upon Kurt Heiser, CJA Administrator, Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/11/2015 GRANTING Mr. Ervine's 2 request to proceed IFP. Mr. Ervine's 1 application for appointment of counsel is GRANTED. Counsel will be appointed following notice from the Eastern District Selection Board either that the Federal Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, or that other qualified counsel available for appointment has been identified. Mr. Ervine's 1 request for stay of execution is DENIED without prejudice to renewal should any proceedings related to the execution of his sentence of death be instituted in state court during the pendency of the instant proceedings.. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ervine v. Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ron Davis | |
| Represented By: | Laura Wetzel Simpton |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Norman Sokoler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dennis Newton Ervine | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Marie Corey Mann |
| Represented By: | Karl Saddlemire |
| Represented By: | Tivon Schardl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
