Boyrs v. Paramo
Petitioner: Robert R. Boyrs
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Case Number: 2:2015cv01942
Filed: September 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 8/3/2021 ORDERING the Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/27/2018 DENYING without prejudice petitioner's 34 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
May 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/23/2017 GRANTING 30 Motion for Extension of time. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of service of this order to file a traverse. (Donati, J)
February 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/07/17 ordering the sealed portion of the Clerks Transcript (pages 198-204) from petitioners state court proceedings regarding his motion filed under California Evidence Code § 782 is potentia lly relevant to the proceedings in this case. Respondent shall have sixty days from service of this order to obtain the sealed transcript, which shall be lodged under seal in this court, and file a response to the petition. (Plummer, M) Modified on 2/8/2017 (Plummer, M).
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/3/17 ORDERING that respondent's motion to suspend briefing (ECF No. 23 ) is GRANTED and respondent's deadline to respond to the petition is VACATED. Within 30 days of service of this order, petitioner must provide respondent with a copy of the sealed portion of the Clerk's Transcript (pages 198-204). Petitioner should not file a copy with the court. If petitioner is unable to provide a copy of the sealed transcript, then within 30 days of service of this order he must file a notice with the court explaining why he cannot provide respondent with a copy of the sealed transcript.(Dillon, M)
May 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/03/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 14 Findings and Recommendations. The STAY in this case is LIFTED and the case shall proceed on the first amended petition. (Jackson, T)
April 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/7/16 RECOMMENDING that the stay be lifted and the case proceed on the first amended petition. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/20/16: The findings and recommendations 9 , are adopted in full. Petitioner's motions for stay and abeyance 7 , 8 are granted. (Kaminski, H)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/14/15 recommending that petitioner's motions for stay and abeyance 7 , 8 be granted. Upon receiving the ruling of the California Supreme Court exhausting petitioner 's as-yet unexhausted grounds, petitioner be required, within 30 days thereafter: a) To inform this court of any such ruling and to request the stay be lifted; and b) To file an amended federal petition containing all of his exhausted claims. Motions 7 ,and 8 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyrs v. Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert R. Boyrs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?