Burnett v. Weeks et al
| Ester Burnett |
| R. Weeks, R. Peery, D.L. Kraft, R. Gam Berg, J. Peterson, D. Clark, R.L. Gower, F. Foulk, C. Tileston and D. Foston |
| 2:2015cv02070 |
| October 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Imperial |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ester Burnett signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/6/2016. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to t he Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/17/2015 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/6/2015 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a certified trust account statement. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
