Hmong I v. Lao People's Democratice Republic, et al
| Hmong I |
| Lao People's Democratic Republic, Choummaly Sayasone, Thongsing Thammavong, Bounkert Sangsomasack, Sengnuan Xayalath, Thongbanh Sengaphone and Bounchanh |
| 2:2015cv02349 |
| November 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/17/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend (ECF No. 41 ) is DENIED, with prejudice; The Court's Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 40), is DISCHARGED; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
54
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/12/2017 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:17-cv-00927-MCE-CKD is hereby reassigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Alison Claire for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-cv-00927-TLN-AC. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/13/2016 ORDERING The findings and recommendations 34 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's 19 motion for default judgment is DENIED in its entirety; the Court hereby STRIKES 31 the first amende d complaint filed 3/30/2016, due to Plaintiff's failure to request leave to amend in accordance with FRCP 15(a)(2); because it appears 36 the pending motion for default judgment and motion for class certification 35 are based upon the amended complaint, those motions are DENIED as MOOT; Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing within 30 days of this order, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
34
AMENDED ORDER FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/17/16. ORDERING that 30 Order and F&Rs are VACATED; plaintiff's 28 29 Requests for Leave To File additional materials are DENIED; RECOMMENDING that 19 plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment be denied in its entirety; plaintiff should be Ordered to Show Cause why the lawsuit against the sitting President and Prime Minister of Laos should not be dismissed with prejudice based upon the S uggestion of Immunity; and plaintiff should be Ordered To Show Cause why the remainder of this lawsuit should not be dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction; referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to these F&Rs due wtih 21 days. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/11/2016 ORDERING that plaintiff's 28 , 29 Requests for Leave to File additional materials are DENIED. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's 19 mo tion for default judgment should be denied in its entirety. Plaintiff should be Ordered to Show Cause why this entire action should not be dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction. Motion referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/26/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall return the letters received in this case to their senders, along with a copy of this order.(Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
