Ledford v. State of California et al
Scott Ledford |
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Deuel Vocational Institute, Chengjie Wei, Valley State Prison, Nagabhushana Malakkla and Barbara Woodard |
2:2015cv02381 |
November 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/08/2021 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims against Malakkla and Woodward; Defendants' M otion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's loss of consortium claim; and Defendants' Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim against Wei. The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report within thirty (30) days of the electronic filing date of this Order indicating their readiness to proceed to trial and proposing trial dates as to the sole remaining claim against Wei. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/10/18 GRANTING 27 Motion to Dismiss. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/4/2017 GRANTING 14 Motion to Dismiss and DENYING 19 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the filed date of this order. (Donati, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.