Nowlin v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
||Danielle A. Nowlin
||California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
||December 16, 2015
||US District Court for the Eastern District of California
||Kimberly J. Mueller
||Kendall J. Newman
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 20, 2017
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/17: This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. The pending motion for terminating sanctions (ECF No. 16) is DENIED as moot. (Kaminski, H)
|December 28, 2015
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/28/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; FINDING that service of the 1 Complaint is appropriate for Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; DIRECTING the Clerk o f Court issue all process pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 4 forthwith and to send the plaintiff one USM-285 form, one 4 Summons, and the 5 Civil New Case Documents; ORDERING the plaintiff to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 30 days, with all the inform ation they need to effectuate service and to file a statement with the court within 10 days thereafter that such documents have been submitted; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs within 90 days of receipt of t he required documents from the plaintiff; WARNING the plaintiff that a failure to comply with this order may result in any appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of the action pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b). (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?