James v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Daniel Edward James |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2015cv02717 |
| December 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/10/2017 ORDERING that Daniel Edward James be awarded attorney fees in the amount of three-thousand, five-hundred dollars ($3,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA).(Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/6/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's 27 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for plaintiff, and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/11/2016 ORDERING that the Defendant shall have a brief, second EXTENSION of time of 3 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The new due date will be 10/14/2016. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/9/2016 ORDERING that the Defendant shall have a first EXTENSION of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The new due date will be 10/8/2016. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/7/2016 ORDERING that plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 7/18/2016. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/4/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP 2 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 14 days Plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. (cc: USM). (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Edward James | |
| Represented By: | Vijay Jagdish Patel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A. Kenney, GOVT |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
