Ramirez v. Duffy
| Juan Razo Ramirez |
| Brian Duffy and Special Appearance |
| 2:2016cv00234 |
| February 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/24/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 27 request to suspend this action. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/19/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for extension of time (ECF No. 21 ) is GRANTED. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the following document to the court: An original and one copy of the Amended Complaint filed on the court's form. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/11/16 ordering laintiffs August 1, 2016 filing 19 is stricken. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the following document to the court: An original and one copy of the Amended Complaint filed on the courts form. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner.(Plummer, M) Modified on 8/11/2016 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/30/16 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Kenneth Donney and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/16 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson shall address plaintiff's filing (ECF No. 11 ); and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's filing (ECF No. 11 ) on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson. (cc Monica Anderson)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/01/16 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of court or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/9/16 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson shall address plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1 ) on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson. (cc Monica Anderson)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
