Jackson v. Gibbs et al
Curtis Renee Jackson |
D. Gibbs and P. Reece |
2:2016cv00685 |
March 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/1/2018 GRANTING 13 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his objections. (Huang, H) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/11/18 RECOMMENDING that 11 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/25/2017 GRANTING 9 Request. Plaintiff has 45 days from the date this order is served to file his amended complaint. (Hunt, G) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/4/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Curtis Renee Jackson. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department)(Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.