A.C. et al v. City of Fairfield et al
| A.C., I.C., Guadalupe Villa-Vargas, Arturo Ceja-Gonzalez, W.C., J.C., Pablo Ceja and Leticia Ceja |
| City of Fairfield, Joe Griego, Daniel Hatzell and Clinton Morgan |
| 2:2016cv00746 |
| April 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/18/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice; and the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/24/18 ORDERING that, no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiffs shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to show cause will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/13/2018 GRANTING 30 Motion to Withdraw. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/2/2018 GRANTING 31 Notice of Request to Seal Document. The Court GRANTS Counsel permission to file Declaration of Melissa Nold in Support of Motion to Withdraw under seal. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/14/17. The Court ORDERS the matter STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 07/10/17 ORDERING that, pursuant to 24 Stipulation, the close of fact discovery is EXTENDED to 11/27/17 and the close of expert discovery is EXTENDED to 01/08/18. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/9/2017 ORDERING 22 Pursuant to the parties stipulation, and Good cause having been shown, the Court PERMITS parties joint Protective Order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/11/2016 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 12 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING the plaintiffs twenty days to file a Second Amended Complaint; in the event a Second Amended Complaint is not filed, ORDERING the defendants to file their answers to the 7 First Amended Complaint within thirty days. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/8/16 ORDERING that the deadline to submit a joint status report now set for June 10, 2016 is continued by 30 days to July 8, 2016. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 05/25/16 ORDERING that the 8 Request to Seal is GRANTED; the second attachment to the 7 Amended Complaint is SEALED. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/12/16 ORDERING that Plaintiffs are GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint, including Successor-in-Interest Declarations, within 14 days of this Order. Defendant will file an a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint within 20 days of Plaintiffs filing the First Amended Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
