PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Treder & Weiss, LLP et al
| PHH Mortgage Corporation |
| Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss LLP, Robert E Weiss, Cris A. Klingerman, Brian Engel, James C. Frappier and Steve P. Turner |
| Edward A. Treder |
| 2:2016cv00832 |
| April 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yuba |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/6/2017 ORDERING that the court OVERRULES defendants' objections to the proffer material filed as ECF Nos. 67 at 1-5 and 67-2 and 67-3, as these documents are relevant to the agreement and its potential applicability in this matter. The court will not consider portions of plaintiff's proffer unrelated to counsel's representations at the 10/20/2017 hearing. The court therefore SUSTAINS defendant's objections with r espect to proffer material regarding the Texas statute of limitations, ECF Nos. 67 at 5:12-7:9 and 67-1. Defendant is entitled to respond. Defendant's response, limited to ten pages, is due seven days after this order is issued, and should ad dress, at a minimum, (1) whether the Legal Services Agreement(s) governed the parties' relationship from the inception of Linza, and (2) if so, whether the New Jersey statute of limitations for legal malpractice governs this action. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
59
AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/17/17 ORDERING that, pursuant to 58 Stipulation, the Court PARTIALLY MODIFIES the scheduling conference as follows: Hearing on Dispositive Motions: 10/20/17 at 10: 00 a.m.; Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due 03/02/18; Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/23/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The due dates for trial and trial briefs are now VACATED, and will be determined at the final pre-trial conference. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
57
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/18/2017 ORDERING completion of expert discovery CONTINUED to 6/26/2017; Hearing on dispositive motions CONTINUED to 8/11/2017; filing of final pretrial conference statement CONTINUED to 10/27/2017; Final pretrial conference CONTINUED to 11/17/2017 at 10:00 AM; filing date for trial briefs CONTINUED to 12/18/2017; Trial CONTINUED to 1/2/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
53
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/1/17 ORDERING that the deadline for the disclosure of expert witnesses is EXTENDED to 4/7/2017. The deadline for the disclosure of supplemental expert witnesses is EXTENDED to 4/27/2017. The deadline for expert discovery is EXTENDED to 5/25/2017. The deadline for dispositive motions is EXTENDED to 6/30/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
48
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/26/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of California, re 27 Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3). Signed by Judge James Donato on 4/20/2016. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)[Transferred from cand on 4/22/2016.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
