Global Commodities Trading Group, Inc. et al v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, S.A. et al
| Global Commodities Trading Group, Inc. and The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
| Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, S.A., Sady Farid Andonie Reyes and Joyce Mary Jarufe Dox |
| 2:2016cv01045 |
| May 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/18/2022 ADOPTING 168 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 164 Motion for Default Judgment as described in the order; and ENTERING Default Judgment against defendants in the amount of $13,661,790.29 USD plus interest of $1,797.47 per day from 1/18/2022 through entry of judgment with postjudgment interest at the statutory rate of 28 U.S.C. § 1961. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/6/22 ORDERING that plaintiffs serve an electronic copy of this order and findings and recommendations on defendants forthwith to their last known ema il addresses, and thereafter plaintiffs shall file a notice of such service within 10 days. RECOMMENDING that Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment 164 be granted as set forth herein. Judgment be entered in plaintiffs' favor and against Bachosa and Reyes on counts one and two, against Reyes and Dox on count three, and against Bachosa on count four. Default judgment be entered against defendants in the amount of $13,661,790.29 USD, plus interest of $1 ,797.47 per day from January 18, 2022, through entry of judgment, with postjudgment interest at the statutory rate of 28 U.S.C. § 1961. F&R referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/22/2022 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 164 that plaintiffs may file supplemental briefing addressing the request for default judgment against defendants Reyes and Dox on count four of the complaint, for goods sold and delivered, within 14 days of the date of this order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/2/2020 ACCORDINGLY, Pursuant to the Opinion and Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (ECF No. 130 ), Defendants' forum non conveniens motion is DENIED. (ECF No. 12 .)(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/7/2018 DENYING 113 Motion to Amend the Judgment for the reasons set forth in this order. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/28/17 ORDERING for the reasons stated above, the Court declines to award costs for printing/copies, written interpretations, courier fees, travel expenses, legal research and expert witnesses who did not appear in court. Accordingly, Plaintiffs objections (ECF No. 1 12 ) are hereby SUSTAINED. Defendants are permitted costs for the filing fee in the amount of $400.00. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/17/17 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 11 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's MOTION to Amend 36 is hereby DENIED. The remaining four MOTIONS 12 , 14 , 54 , & 70 are hereby DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/28/2016 ORDERING that defendants' 94 Request for Reconsideration is DENIED AS MOOT. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/17/2016 GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 68 Motion to Compel; GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 33 Motion for Protective Order Staying Merits Discovery. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/25/16 ORDERING that the Defendants' ex parte motion to strike (ECF No. 70 ) is hereby submitted on the briefing. At this time, the Court will not grant Defendants' request to file a s ur-reply. The Court will rule on these matters at its earliest availability, keeping in mind that matters filed before the Court prior to the parties' submission take precedence. Further peppering of this Court with unnecessary motions that could be amicably decided between the parties will result in sanctions. The Court expects the parties to comply with this Court's order and act with the appropriate level of civility and professionalism. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/14/2016 VACATING the hearing on 33 Motion for Protective Order set for 9/21/2016; INFORMING all parties that said motion may be re-noticed for hearing, at a mutually convenient time and date, after all issues related to the current discovery dispute can be heard at the same time. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/28/2016 DENYING 21 Motion for TRO. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/21/16 ORDERING that Defendants' deadline to respond to the complaint is extended up to and including 7/1/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
