Pirtle v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Angela Pirtle |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv01080 |
| May 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/2/2018 GRANTING 20 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded $5,117.74 in fees pursuant to the EAJA. 22 The Order to Show Cause is hereby DISCHARGED. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/18. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 14 days of this order: Defendant shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for its failure to comply with the Court's order. Defendant shall provide an opposition, statement of non-opposition, or a stipulation by the parties, regarding plaintiff's Motion for attorney fees 20 . Failure to respond will be deemed as non-opposition to Plaintiff's Motion. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/17 GRANTING in PART plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING the Commissioner's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the action is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this order pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/17/2017 ORDERING that Plaintiff's time to file a Summary Judgment motion is hereby EXTENDED to 5/5/2017. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/20/2016 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis; Service of process is appropriate for the Commissioner of Social Security; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serv e the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a n original and five copies each of the completed summons, the complaint, the scheduling order, and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pirtle v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angela Pirtle | |
| Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
