King v. Davey
Jerry Lee King |
Dave Davey |
2:2016cv01464 |
June 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Kings |
Edmund F. Brennan |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/5/2019 RECOMMENDING 51 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/4/2019 ORDERING, as a one-time only courtesy, the Clerk shall mail petitioner copies of Docket Nos. 67 and 68 . Petitioner's 72 third amended petition is DISREGARDED and the 51 second amended complaint will remain operative and be deemed submitted. (Yin, K) |
Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/26/2018 GRANTING 66 Request for Extension of Time and DENYING as MOOT 68 Motion to Amend the Complaint. Petitioner has already been granted leave to amend. He should file his amended petition within 60 days from the date this order is filed. (Huang, H) |
Filing 65 ORDER ADOPTING 62 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 04/17/18 DENYING 55 Motion to Stay; as explainedby the Magistrate Judge, if petitioner wishes to add claims he has recently exhausted back into the petition, he must file a motion to amend the petition. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 62 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/13/2018 RECOMMENDING 55 motion to stay be denied. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 52 ORDER adopting in full 50 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/29/17. The motion to stay 40 is DENIED, and the amended petition is dismissed with leave to amend to allow petitioner the opportunity to file a fully exhausted petition and then seek a stay under Kelly v. Small. Respondent is directed to file and serve a response to the second amended petition within 60 days. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of an answer. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 50 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/11/17 ORDERING that respondent's 06/05/17 request to stay the briefing schedule 48 is granted and the briefing schedule set forth in ECF 39 is hereby V ACATED. Also, RECOMMENDING that the 4/14/17 motiion to stay 40 be denied, and the amended petition be dismissed with leave to amend to allow petitioner the opportunity to file a fully exhausted petition and then seek a stay under Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063(9th Cir. 2002). Motion to Stay 40 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/5/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 34 motion is DENIED as moot. Defendants need not inquire into the status of plaintiff's access to his legal property as directed in the 4/19/2017 order. (Yin, K) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/19/2017 ORDERING counsel for defendants shall inquire into the status of plaintiff's access to his legal property no later than 14 days from the date of this order. Within 21 days, defendants shall file an opposition, or other appropriate response, to plaintiff 2/8/2017 motion 34 .(Yin, K) |
Filing 36 ORDER adopting 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/24/17: MOTION to dismiss is granted 17 and the petition is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner's motions to stay 27 , 30 are denied without prejudice. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/17 RECOMMENDING that the September 1, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17 ) be granted, and that the petition be dismissed with leave to amend to allow petitioner the opportunity to file a fully exhausted petition and then seek a stay under Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2002). Petitioner's motions to stay (ECF Nos. 27 , 30 ) be denied without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/15/16. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/1/16 DENYING without prejudice 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: King v. Davey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jerry Lee King | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dave Davey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.