Evans v. Fox et al
| Gene Evans |
| Robert Fox, K. Lasseiter, Montemayor, B. J. and Brian Duffy |
| 2:2016cv01997 |
| August 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/24 ADOPTING 100 the Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 97 Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen this Case. (Salmeron, A)
|
|
Filing
100
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 07/17/24 RECOMMENDING that 97 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel and Motion to Reopen Case be denied. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/22/24 ADOPTING in full 90 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 84 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/28/23 DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel and RECOMMENDING that 84 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 06/26/2023 DIRECTING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, within 21 days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court's local rules. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/13/22 GRANTING 79 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. The deadline to complete discovery, including any motions to compel, is extended to February 10, 2023. The deadline for summary-judgment motions is extended to April 13, 2023. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/7/22 GRANTING 62 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's answers to Defendants' request for discovery due within 30 days of this order. Discovery due by 12/7/22. Dispositive motions due by 2/7/23. (Her, S)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/11/2022 GRANTING IN PART 68 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 62 Motion to Compel. No further extensions of time will be granted. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 06/14/22 ORDERING Plaintiff shall show cause within twenty-one days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the local rules. Should plaintiff wis h to continue with this lawsuit, he shall, within twenty-one days, file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion to compel; GRANTING 64 Motion to modify the scheduling order. all discovery deadlines and the deadline for filing dispositive motions are VACATED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/21/21 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form, along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed June 27, 2019 to be completed and returned within 60 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/14/2021 GRANTING plaintiff's 56 motion to set a settlement conference, DENYING without prejudice defendants' 55 motion for a scheduling order, and REFERRING CASE TO POST-SC REENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The assigned DAG shall contact the Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/24/20 GRANTING 45 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading by 12/07/20. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/16/2020 DENYING 43 Motion for Service. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/15/20 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet and a copy of the 6/27/19 complaint to be completed and returned with the notice of submission of documents within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/10/2020 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 12/23/2019 in full; DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against defendants Fox, Zometa, Ballenger, Tabbs, and Does 1-50 without leave to amend ; DISMISSING Plaintiff's First Amendment claims against defendants Wong, Lassiter, and Bjorson without leave to amend; and REFERRING this matter back to the magistrate judge to effectuate service of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Montemayor, Wong, Lassiter, and Bjorson pursuant to the Court's E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases for the Eastern District of California.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/23/19 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. The Clerk of Court strike the fifth amended prisoner civil rights complaint filed on September 19, 2019 24 . The Clerk of Court send a copy of the docket in this action to plaintiff at his address of record and DENYING 23 plaintiff's motion for extension of time. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiffs claims against defendants Fox, Zometa, Ballenger, Tabbs, and Does 1-50 be dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiffs First Amendment claims against defendants Wong, Lassiter, and Bjorson be dismissed without leave to amend. This matter be referred back to the undersigned to effectuate service of plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Montemayor, Wong, Lassiter, and Bjorson pursuant to the Courts E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases for the Eastern District of California. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/28/2019 DISMISSING the 17 second and 18 third amended complaints with leave to amend within 30 days. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/11/18 DISMISSING 13 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Gene Evans. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
