Romine v. Duppman et al
| Chad J. Romine |
| Geoff Duppman, Dennis Madden, Kurt Scales, Darren White, Mike Talbott, Travis Jarvis and Chris Stelz |
| 2:2016cv02012 |
| August 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| El Dorado |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/29/17: The findings and recommendations filed May 4, 2017, are adopted. MOTIONS to dismiss 5 , 13 , 19 are granted. The complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's motion to amend 23 is denied. The Clerk is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/4/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is denied as moot. RECOMMENDING that defendants Stelz, Duppman, Madden, and Scales motions to dismiss 5 , 13 , 19 be granted. The complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's motion to amend 23 be denied. The Clerk be directed to close the case. F&R are submitted to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
