Kaighn et al v. Trump
| Janis Kaighn and Gregory R. Kaighn |
| Donald Trump |
| 2:2016cv02227 |
| September 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/10/17 ORDERING the 26 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The request for leave to amend the complaint is DENIED. All other pending motions, 5 , 24 , 47 , 50 , 75 and 80 are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/21/2016. The multiplicity of plaintiffs' filings is a burden on both the court and defendants and impedes the proper prosecution of this action. Plaintiffs' future filings shall ther efore be limited. Plaintiffs have also sent several e-mails directly to the court's official e-mail address, which the court has docketed at ECF No. 153. This type of communication to the courts official e-mail address is not provided for by t he Local Rules. The court will block all future communications from plaintiffs to the court's official e-mail. Plaintiffs are limited to submitted any proper filings, subject to the Local Rules and this Order, using the courts CM/ECF system.(Andrews, P)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
