Tobia v. The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 3, 2017
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/2017 ORDERING that within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice based on his apparent fai lure to supply the U.S. Marshal with the documents set forth in the court's 10/18/2016 order, failure to file a notice in this action that he supplied the U.S. Marshal with such documents, and failure to appear at the 3/2/2017 initial scheduling conference. Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Zignago, K.)
|October 18, 2016
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP 2 is GRANTED; Service of the complaint is appropriate for defendants The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California and Anthony Brent W indom; The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4; Plaintiff shall supply the U.S. Marshal, within 30 days from the date this order is filed, with all information needed by the U.S. Marshal to effectuate service of process, and shall, within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. (cc: USM).(Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?