Wood v. Gastelo
| Benjamin Randolph Wood |
| Josie Gastelo |
| 2:2016cv02621 |
| November 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 5/8/2019 DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability (COA). Any further request for a COA must be addressed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/17/2017 GRANTING 30 Request for Extension of Time. Respondent to file responsive pleading on or before 8/13/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/15/17 ordering respondent to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 30 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/21/17 ordering respondent's request 22 is granted. If petitioner possesses a copy of the sealed Marsden hearing transcript, and is able to provide it. petitioner shall provide a copy o f the transcript to respondent within 30 days from the date of this order. Within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner file a notice with the court indicating whether or not he has provided the Marsden hearing transcript to respondent. The briefing requirements set forth in the 4/14/17 order are suspended, and both parties are relieved of their obligation to file briefing pending further order of court. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/14/2017 DENYING 16 Motion to Dismiss as moot; DENYING 13 Motion for Stay as moot; ORDERING the respondent to file a response to the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus within sixty (60) d ays; ORDERING the petitioner to file a reply, if any, to the respondent's answer, or to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the respondent's motion, within thirty (30) days after its service; ORDERING the respondent to file a reply in support of any motion fourteen (14) days thereafter; DENYING 19 Motion to Amend the Petition without prejudice. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion for Extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/17: Respondent shall file a responsive brief on or before March 17, 2017. Petitioner's traverse is due thirty days thereafter. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wood v. Gastelo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Benjamin Randolph Wood | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Josie Gastelo | |
| Represented By: | Justain Paul Riley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
