Johnson v. The Burke Company, LLC et al
| Scott Johnson |
| The Burke Company, LLC, Rodelyn Gargantilla Raffs, Deok Nam Kim, Jae Jung Kim, Isabel U. Rodriguez and Moses Elimar Rodriguez |
| 2:2016cv02881 |
| December 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/18. The court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days (1) why this court should not sanction Plaintiff $250.00 for failing to heed the court's instruction; and/or (2) why the court should not dismiss this case against defendant Raffs for failure to prosecute. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/25/17 ORDERING the court GRANTS the motion to withdraw. CSA is ORDERED to serve on Isabel U. Rodriguez and Moses Elimar Rodriguez a copy of this order and file proof of service within seven ( 7) days. Because CSA does not provide the fee agreement the Rodriguezes allegedly violated thereby forcing it to bring this motion, the court DENIES CSA's request for reasonable reimbursement; The court also DENIES CSA's request for sanct ions against plaintiff for incorrectly asserting CSA declined to participate in a recent joint statement. 37 The court has reviewed the parties' statements, 37 38 , detailing the overlapping communications between the parties in the day s leading up to their joint statement 36 . Based on this review, sanctions are not warranted against plaintiff, based on his representations tothe court. Nor are sanctions warranted against CSA, given its attempts to comply with the court's order requiring a joint statement.As a result of the court's order, Isabel U. Rodriguez and Moses Elimar Rodriguez are now proceeding pro se. The Clerk of the Court shall reflect as much on the court's docket. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
