Lee v. California Correctional Center et al
| Oscar Clayborne Lee |
| California Correctional Center, S. Perry, Shavers, Stout, Gomez, Barron, B. Meek, Smith, Madden, Hanson, Barrett, Dellacort, Hays, Javar and Lawton |
| 2:2017cv00024 |
| January 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/08/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/2018 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Oscar Clayborne Lee. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
