Valentine v Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Valentine v Social Security Administration

Valentine v Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Deshayla Valentine
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	2:2017cv00051
Filed:	January 9, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Deborah Barnes
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/9/2017 ORDERING 3 that the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is VACATED; and the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as having been RENDERED MOOT; RECOMMENDING that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; and this action be closed; Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
February 9, 2017	Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/8/17: Plaintiff show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Hearing as to 3 Motion to Dismiss continued to 3/17/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. On or before 3/3/17, plaintiff shall file a statement of opposition or non-opposition to motion to dismiss. (Kaminski, H)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/9/2017 ORDERING 3 that the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is VACATED; and the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as having been RENDERED MOOT; RECOMMENDING that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; and this action be closed; Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

February 9, 2017

Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/8/17: Plaintiff show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Hearing as to 3 Motion to Dismiss continued to 3/17/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. On or before 3/3/17, plaintiff shall file a statement of opposition or non-opposition to motion to dismiss. (Kaminski, H)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valentine v Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Edward A. Olsen, GOVT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deshayla Valentine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?