Meador v. Martin et al
Gordon Dale Meador |
Fred Martin, Hillard, Roth, G Kelley, Garcia, Mack and Zamora |
2:2017cv00203 |
January 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Los Angeles |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/2018 ORDERING 39 Plaintiff's inquiry is premature. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/13/2017 RECOMMENDING 19 and 22 Motions for Preliminary Injunction be denied without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/12/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Gordon D. Meador. The Director of the CDCR shall collect monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/2017 ORDERING plaintiff has 30 days to submit either the filing fee or the application required by by § 1915(a). The Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.