Baldizon et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Janette Baldizon, Ana Miriam Baldizon and Estate of Robert Baldizon |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Ron Rackley |
| 2:2017cv00228 |
| February 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| William B. Shubb |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/10/2018 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii); each side to bear their own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
47
STIPULATION and ORDER for extension 46 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/13/2018: Plaintiff may file a further Amended Complaint or other pleading no later than 5/11/2018. Initial Expert Witness Disclosures are due by 11/30/2018. Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures are due by 1/30/2019. The discovery cut-cut off is extended to 4/1/2019. All other dates remain the same. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER 44 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/21/2018 extending time to file Amended Complaint by 4/13/2018. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/3/2018 GRANTING extension of time to file Amended Complaint to 2/21/2018. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/2/18 ORDERING that the deadline to submit Initial Disclosures is EXTENDED to fifteen days after the filing of an Answer by Macomber, or fifteen days after the Court denies a Motion to Dismiss filed by Macomber, whichever event occurs first.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 24 MOTION TO DISMISS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/18/2017: IT IS ORDERED that 32 Defendant Macomber's motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Plaintiffs have twenty days from the date this Order is signed to file a First Amended Complaint, if they can do so consistent with this Order.(Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER to Advance Hearing Date 35 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/24/2017 re 34 Defendant Macomber's Motion to Dismiss: The suggested date of 11/27/2017 is not convenient to the court. Accordingly, in order to accommodate the request of counsel, the motion will be TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER 29 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/28/2017 granting leave for plaintiff to file a Third Amended Complaint no later than 9/28/2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/20/17: The time for Defendant Macomber to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended to September 29, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/23/17: In light of the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time for Defendant R. Rackley to respond to the Complaint is extended to March 24, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
