Edmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Wanda Edmon
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2017cv00447
Filed: February 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/12/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING the Commissioner's 24 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in the Commissioner's favor and close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
January 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/3/18, ORDERING that defendants 24 cross-motion for summary judgment is DEEMED timely filed. (Kastilahn, A)
December 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/18/17 ORDERING that the time for defendant to respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 12/22/17. (Benson, A.)
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/20/2017 EXTENDING time until 12/17/2017, for defendant to respond to plaintiff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M)
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/11/17: Plaintiff's time to file her summary judgment motion is hereby extended to October 17, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
August 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/2/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's time to file her summary judgment motion is EXTENDED to 9/8/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
March 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/2/2017 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve the 5 Scheduling Order in Social Security Cases; ORDERING the plaintiff to submit to the U.S. Marshal within fo urteen days, an original and five copies of the completed 4 Summons, five copies of the 1 Social Security Complaint, and five copies of the 5 Scheduling Order and to file a statement with the court attesting to such service; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs within sixty days. (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda Edmon
Represented By: Bess M. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Represented By: Tina Naicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?