Campbell v. Martin et al
| Senarble Campbell |
| F. Martin, Kenton, R. Gomez and D. McCarthy |
| 2:2017cv00866 |
| April 24, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/15/17 ordering the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff 1 copy of the 5/25/17 amended complaint. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the 3 copies of the amended complaint required to effect service. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/26/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Senarble Campbell. The Director of the CDCR shall collect monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/2017 ORDERING plaintiff to file, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the required fees in the amount of $400. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER TRANFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/24/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
