McDaniel v. Abbott Laboratories Group Health Care Plan et al
Scott McDaniel |
Abbott Laboratories Group Health Care Plan, Mary Moreland and Matrix Absence Management, Inc. |
2:2017cv01602 |
August 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Morrison C. England |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/26/2018. Each party to bear its own attorney's fees, expenses, and costs. CASE CLOSED. (York, M) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/2/2017 ORDERING this case shall be STAYED until the conclusion of the parties' VDRP proceeding and until any party's service of a Notice of Termination of Stay on all parties up on the conclusion thereof; the deadlines for Defendants Abbott and Moreland to respond to the Complaint shall be EXTENDED 15-days from the date of service of a Notice of Termination of Stay should the case not reach resolution in the VDRP proceeding; should the case not reach resolution in the VDRP proceeding, the parties are ORDERED to file a Notice of Termination of Stay with the Court not later than 20 days from the conclusion of that VDRP proceeding. CASE STAYED (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.