O'Connor v. Lizarraga
Petitioner: Glenn O'Connor
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Case Number: 2:2017cv01704
Filed: August 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). CASE CLOSED (Yin, K)
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER transferring case to Sacramento Division signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/17/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Connor v. Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Glenn O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Represented By: Pamela B. Hooley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?