Conner v. Placer County et al
Derek Conner |
Placer County, Devon Bell, Jeffrey Villanueva, Ervin and Placer County Sheriff's Office |
2:2017cv01830 |
September 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
Troy L. Nunley |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/2/2018 ORDERING the rescheduling of jury trials in the related cases (2:17-cv-00760-GEB-KJN, 2:17-cv-01579-GEB-KJN, 2:17-cv-01667-GEB-KJN, and 2:17-cv-02312-GEB-KJN). See order for details. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/18/2018 DENYING 18 Motion for Attorney Fees insofar as it seeks fees beyond the amount provided for in the Rule 68 agreement. Plaintiff's counsel is entitled to attorneys' fees of $11,430, plus costs in the amount of $400.00. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/17 ORDERING that Within fourteen days of the date of this order, counsel for Plaintiff in 17- cv-1667 and counsel for defendants in the above-entitled cases shall inform the court whether they have any opposition to relating these cases. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the instant order on all counsel in the above entitled cases. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.