Vickers v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Cleveland Vickers
Defendant: O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC and Honda I, LLC
Case Number: 2:2017cv01948
Filed: September 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/17/19 CONTINUING deadlines as follows: Discovery completed by 8/16/19. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/30/19. Designation of Rebuttal Experts due by 9/13/19. Expert Discovery cutoff is 9/27/19. Dispositive Motions heard by 11/1/19. (Coll, A)
February 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/26/19 MODIFYING the Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order 21 as follows: Completion of Discovery by 4/19/2019. Designation of Experts by 5/1/2019. Designation of Rebuttal Experts by 5/15/2019. Expert Discovery Cutoff 5/29/2019. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/18/2018 AMENDING the 21 Scheduling Order to EXTEND the deadline for the parties to seek leave to amend the pleadings to 10/29/2018. (Zignago, K.)
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/31/2018 CONTINUING the Initial Scheduling Conference to 6/21/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Hunt, G)
October 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/8/2017 ORDERING This action is STAYED except as set forth herein and all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED pending further order of the court. The parties are directed to prompt ly meet and confer to discuss settlement of this action. If the parties have not been able to informally reach a settlement within 45 days, the parties shall initiate participation in the court's VDRP. No later than fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report. (cc: VDRP)(Washington, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vickers v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cleveland Vickers
Represented By: Zachary Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
Represented By: Eugene John Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honda I, LLC
Represented By: Eugene John Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?