Sorenson, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
Bernard Sorenson and Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson |
Ford Motor Company |
2:2017cv01987 |
September 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
John A Mendez |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE., attorney Gillian Mellon, NCAED terminated (Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 32 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/23/2018. (York, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #32 Order served on Gillian Mellon NCAED. (York, M) |
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 2:18-cv-00996. (Robles, S) |
Filing 30 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #30 Order served on Gillian Mellon NCAED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 29 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Bernard Sorenson, Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson. (Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 28 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2018 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:17-CV-02306 TLN KJN be REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings; any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on the documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02306 JAM AC. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:17-cv-01987, 2:17-cv-02006, 2:17-cv-02378, 2:17-cv-02380, 2:17-cv-02382, 2:17-cv-02388, 2:17-cv-02389, 2:17-cv-02586 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/17/2017 ORDERING that this matter shall be stayed in its entirety for 60 days and that the parties shall submit a joint status report to the Court on 1/15/18 concerning the status of the settlement. (Washington, S) |
Filing 25 OPPOSITION by Bernard Sorenson, Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson to #17 Motion to Stay. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Santos, Rowena) Modified on 11/21/2017 (Kaminski, H). |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #26 Stipulation and Order, served on Jacob Cutler NCAED, Gillian Mellon NCAED. (Washington, S) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Instituting 60-Day Stay by Ford Motor Company. (Dawson, Matthew) Modified on 11/20/2017 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER: Defendants Motion to Shorten Time is DENIED. ECF No. 18. Defendants Motion to Stay, ECF No. 17, remains set for hearing on December 5, 2017, with the regular briefing schedule. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY)(Vine, H) |
Filing 22 REPLY by Ford Motor Company in support of #18 Motion to Shorten Time. (Johnson, Paul) Modified on 11/8/2017 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 21 OPPOSITION by Bernard Sorenson, Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson to #18 Motion to Shorten Time. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/3/2017: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for its Motion to Stay, currently set for hearing on December 5, 2017. ECF No. #18 . Plaintiffs may file a response, due Monday, November 6, 2017. Defendant may file a reply the following day, Tuesday, November 7, 2017. If the Court grants the motion, it will then set a consolidated briefing schedule for the Motion to Stay. (Streeter, J) |
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #17 Motion to Stay, #18 Motion to Shorten Time. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 18 MOTION to SHORTEN TIME for #17 Motion to Stay All Proceedings and Deadlines by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Paul) Modified on 11/3/2017 (Becknal, R). |
Filing 17 MOTION to STAY by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 12/5/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Memorandum, #3 Declaration of Paul R. Johnson, #4 Exhibit A - Ford DPS6 - JPML motion, #5 Exhibit B - Ford DPS6 - JPML memorandum, #6 Exhibit C - Ford DPS6 - JPML schedule of cases, #7 Exhibit D - Meet-and-confer email, #8 Exhibit E - Meet-and-confer reply)(Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 16 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/31/17: This action is related with member cases 2:17-CV-02140 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02145 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02147 TLN CMK,2:17-CV-02148 KJM-GGH, Case No. 2:17-CV-02151 MCE-DB, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-KJN, and 2:17-CV-02158 TLN-CMK. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 15 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(Dawson, Matthew) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:17-cv-01987, 2:17-cv-02140, 2:17-cv-02145, 2:17-cv-02147, 2:17-cv-02148, 2:17-cv-02151, 2:17-cv-02153, 2:17-cv-02158 by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 13 MOTION to REMAND by Bernard Sorenson, Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson. Motion Hearing set for 12/5/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Memorandum, #3 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 12 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/20/17 ORDERING the actions denominated 1:17-CV-01317 LJO-MJS, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02051 TLN-AC, 2:17-02053 MCE-DB, 2:17-02079 MCE-GGH, and 2:17- 02092 MCE-EFB, be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company by Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson, Bernard Sorenson.(Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 10 NOTICE to state-court clerk and adverse parties by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #5 Civil New Case Documents for JAM. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Rowena Santos on behalf of Bernard Sorenson, Jacob Bernard Russell Sorenson. Attorney Santos, Rowena added. (Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Answer, filed in state court by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Answer to complaint, filed in state court)(Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 6 ASSOCIATION of ATTORNEY: Added attorney Alexander Gerard Calfo for Ford Motor Company. (Calfo, Alexander) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Michel, G.) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Spencer P. Hugret in support of #1 Notice of Removal. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 2 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, case number 34-2017-00216595 by Ford Motor Company. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 0972-7281039) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.