Tristan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Tristan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Tristan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Paula Tristan
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2017cv02045
Filed:	October 2, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 14, 2018	Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/2018 DENYING 14 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 15 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. CASE CLOSED.(Huang, H)
October 27, 2017	Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/2017 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP; Service of process is appropriate for the Commissioner of Social Security; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersign ed's scheduling order in Social Security cases; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM 5 each of the completed s ummons, the complaint, scheduling order, and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 14, 2018

Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/2018 DENYING 14 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 15 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. CASE CLOSED.(Huang, H)

October 27, 2017

Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/2017 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP; Service of process is appropriate for the Commissioner of Social Security; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersign ed's scheduling order in Social Security cases; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM 5 each of the completed s ummons, the complaint, scheduling order, and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tristan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula Tristan
Represented By:	Steven Gilbert Rosales
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Asim Modi, GOVT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?