Darnes v. Ellis et al
Tamica Nicole Darnes |
John B. Ellis, Robert C. Fracchia, Andrew Horvath and Christine Start |
2:2017cv02170 |
October 18, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/23/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Tamica Nicole Darnes. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/31/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of request to proceed IFP with a certified copy of jail trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.