Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Josef Bailey |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2017cv02360 |
November 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/24/19 APPROVING settlement of attorney fees. Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,422.39 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/16/19 RECOMMENDING that 16 Motion for Summary Judgment be Granted and that 26 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment be Denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 09/19/18. DEEMING the 26 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment timely. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 09/04/18 ORDERING that the defendant's date to respond to plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 09/10/18. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/18/2018, EXTENDING Time up to and including 9/5/2018, for Defendant to Respond to 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/15/2018 GRANTING an Extension of Time for plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment to 6/18/2018. (Hunt, G) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/4/2018 EXTENDING Time through 6/14/2018, for Plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/1/2017 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases and serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to theUnited States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (York, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Josef Bailey | |
Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.