Hagar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Carol Lynee Hagar
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2017cv02381
Filed: November 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Modoc
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 08/16/19 AWARDING Attorneys Fees in the amount of $8,500.00 and costs in the amount of $400.00, per 27 Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (Benson, A.)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/20/19 GRANTING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/19/18 ORDERING that defendant shall file her opposition to plaintiff's opening brief on or before 1/28/19. (Kastilahn, A)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/27/2018 STIPULATING that defendant shall file her opposition to plaintiff's opening brief on or before 12/27/2018. (Huang, H)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/21/2018 DISCHARGING 8 Order to Show Cause. (York, M)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/10/2018 ORDERING plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the court's form entitled "Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment."(Zignago, K.)
July 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/17/2018 ORDERING that the 4 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. (Fabillaran, J)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/18/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to complete service of process. (Fabillaran, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hagar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Lynee Hagar
Represented By: Shanny J. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?