Johnson v. 6300 Mack Road LLC et al
| Scott Johnson |
| 6300 Mack Road LLC and National Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv02475 |
| November 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/2018 ORDERING this action is STAYED pending further order of the court. The parties are directed to promptly meet and confer to discuss settlement of this action. If the parties have not been able to informally reach a settlement within 45 days, the parties shall initiate participation in the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP") by contacting the courts VDRP administrator. The parties shall carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271 No later than 14 days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report. (cc: VDRP) (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2018 APPROVING 9 Stipulation and SETTING ASIDE 8 Clerk's Entry of Default. 6300 Mack Road LLC shall have 10 days from the date it is served with this signed order to file its answer. (York, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
