Sekona v. Brandley, et al.
| Etuate Sekona |
| Brandley, Hang and Santillan |
| 2:2017cv02484 |
| November 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 07/18/19 REVOKING plaintiff's IFP status (cc: UISCA). (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/18/2019 RECOMMENDING 14 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend and the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/25/2018 DENYING without prejudice 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/21/18 DENYING 10 Motion for temporary restraining order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/1/2018 ADOPTING the 9 Findings and Recommendations in full; defendant Hang is DISMISSED with prejudice from this civil action based on the duplicative nature of the allegations in the com plaint; the due process claim against defendant Bradley for issuing plaintiff a false rules violation report is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and the official capacity claims against defendant Bradley and Santillan are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/6/2018 GRANTING 12 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the date of district judge's ruling on 9 Findings and Recommendations in which to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/23/18 GRANTING 7 , 8 Motions to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be co llected in accordance with the court's CDC order filedc concurrently herewith. The Eighth Amendment and retaliation claims against defendant Bradley and the due process claim against defendant Santillan are dismissed with leave to amend. Plain tiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. Also, RECOMMENDING that Defendant Hang be dismissed with prejudice from this civil action based on the duplicative nature of the allegations in the complain t. The due process claim against defendant Bradley for issuing plaintiff a false rules violation report be dismissed without leave to amend. The official capacity claims against defendants Bradley and Santillan be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/29/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit an affidavit to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff an ifp application.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER transferring case to Sacramento Division signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/27/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
