Abdullah v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Mohdmahir Bin Abdullah
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2017cv02522
Filed: December 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/7/19 DENYING Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 16 ); GRANTING Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20 ); AFFIRMING the Commissioner's final decision; and DIRECTING the Clerk to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/26/2019 IT IS SO ORDERED 15 that the Order to Show Cause, issued on 1/16/2019, is hereby DISCHARGED. (Reader, L)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/20/2019 EXTENDING Time to 4/8/2019, for Defendant to file its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/16/2019 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to seek voluntary remand or file a dispositive motion. (Huang, H)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/20/18 DISCHARGING 7 Order to Show Cause. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/10/2018 ORDERING plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to submit service documents to the United States Marshall. (Zignago, K.)
May 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/15/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on Plaintiff the scheduling order in social security cas es. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM at 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814. Within 15 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abdullah v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohdmahir Bin Abdullah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?