Young v. Lee et al
Plaintiff: Ronnie G. Young
Defendant: Lee, Martinez, Ledesma and S. Williams
Case Number: 2:2017cv02596
Filed: December 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/19/2021 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Ronnie G. Young via Zoom video conference at 10:00 a.m. on 4/29/2021 before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: IT Dept & DB) (Henshaw, R)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/4/2020 DENYING without counsel plaintiff's 68 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/18/20. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Plummer, M)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/6/2020 ADOPTING 58 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendant Williams' 55 motion to dismiss Claim Two of the second amended complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Williams is DISMISSED without leave to amend. Defendant Williams is DISMISSED from this case with prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/5/2020 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign this matter to a district court judge and DENYING as unnecessary defendants' 54 motion to strike portions o f plaintiff's second amended complaint. Service is appropriate for Ledesma, Lee, Martinez. The Clerk shall send plaintiff forms for service to be completed and returned within 30 days, along with the Notice of Submission. IT IS RECOMMENDED t hat defendant Williams' 55 motion to dismiss claim two of the second amended complaint be granted; plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against defendant Williams be dismissed without leave to amend; and defendant Williams be dismissed without leave to amend. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/04/20 ORDERING that plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to file a first amended complaint in accordance with the terms of this courts May 15, 2020 screening order. (Plummer, M)
May 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/15/20 GRANTING 24 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 25 Motion to Strike as explained herein. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plainti ff shall complete the attached Notice of Election and return it to the court indicating whether he wants to proceed solely on the excessive force claims against defendants Lee, Martinez, and Ledesma or whether he intends to file a second amended comp laint. Plaintiff has 60 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint if he elects that option and so notifies the court. Defendants Lee, Martinez, and Ledesma need take no action with respect to any second amended complaint filed by plaintiff until instructed by the court to do so. (Plummer, M)
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/13/2020 DENYING without prejudice 47 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Kastilahn, A)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/2020 ORDERING defendants to re-serve a copy of their 24 motion to dismiss and 25 motion to strike on plaintiff at his current address within 7 days. Defendants shall file a notice of service indicating the date and manner of service on plaintiff. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss within 30 days. Defendants' reply, if any, is due 14 days from the date of filing of plaintiff's opposition. (Yin, K)
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/29/2018 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ronnie G. Young. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Lee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronnie G. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ledesma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?