Osorno v. Cintas Corporation
Petitioner: Sara Osorno
Respondent: Cintas Corporation
Case Number: 2:2018at01493
Filed: September 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2018 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Sara Osorno (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Declaration of Scott Malm, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A SM Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B SM Declaration, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C SM Declaration, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D SM Declaration, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E SM Declaration, #8 Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Malm, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osorno v. Cintas Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cintas Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sara Osorno
Represented By: Scott Malm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?