Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Catherine H. Sanchez |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2018cv00066 |
January 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/23/2020 GRANTING IN PART 23 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED attorney's fees under the EAJA in the amount of $11,094.07, plus $2.50 for costs, for a total award of $11,096.57; Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), any payment shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel, unless Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/26/2018 REMANDING this action for further administrative action pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/22/18 GRANTING Defendant's Extension of time to 11/21/2018 to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/20/18: The time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment shall be extended twenty-one (21) days until September 21, 2018.(Kaminski, H) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/19/2018. The time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment is extended 30 days until 8/20/2018. (Cannarozzi, N) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/16/2018 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM an original and 5 copies each of the completed summons, the complaint, and scheduling order, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order.(Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Catherine H. Sanchez | |
Represented By: | Jared Thomas Walker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Mary Firer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.