Thornberry v. Chau et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Thornberry
Defendant: James Chau, C. Smith, M. Bobbala and Adlasghar Mohyuddin
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094
Filed: January 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/8/19 ADOPTING 45 Findings and Recommendations in full. DISMISSING Plaintiff's second amended Complaint 42 ) without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim; CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/23/19 RECOMMENDING that 42 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be Dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim and that the clerk be Directed to close the case. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/8/2019 GRANTING 22 Motion to Amend; DENYING without prejudice 24 Request for Subpoenas; DENYING without prejudice 26 and 27 Motions to Compel; DENYING 31 Motion for Summary Judgment and 28 Motion to "Exceed the Page Length"; VACATING all deadlines in 21 Discovery and Scheduling Order; and DISMISSING 23 First Amended Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/18/18 GRANTING 33 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. Defendant GRANTED until 1/2/19 to complete discovery and until 2/2/19 to file an opposition to 31 Motion for Summary Judgment and a cross-motion for summary judgment. (Coll, A)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/12/2018 ADOPTING 9 findings and recommendations in full. Claims against defendants Chau, Smith, and Bobbala are DISMISSED as duplicative. (Zignago, K.)
May 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/2/2018 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms; and RECOMMENDING claims against defendants Chau, Smith, and Bobbala be dismissed a duplicative. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350. All payments to be collected in accordance with the notice to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. Service is appropriate for Mohyuddin. Cler k to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Form with instruction sheet, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 1/16/2018. Plaintiff to complete and submit the Notice of Submission of Documents with service documents within 30 days from service of this order. Referred to Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornberry v. Chau et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Thornberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Chau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Bobbala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adlasghar Mohyuddin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?