Blueford v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: James Blueford
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2018cv00342
Filed: February 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/28/19 DISMISSING Plaintiff's social security complaint 1 without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's order. See FRCP 41(b); Local Rule 110. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/24/2019 DISCHARGING 20 Order to Show Cause and GRANTING 21 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff must file a motion for summary judgment or notice of voluntary remand by 8/26/2019. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Huang, H)
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/03/19 ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 07/03/19, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's filing of a motion for summary judgment and/or remand within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order; and if plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Benson, A.)
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/25/2018 GRANTING 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant and DIRECTING Plaintiff to complete service by Monday, 6/25/2018. (York, M)
April 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/18/2018. Plaintiff to file pleading no later than 4/27/2018. Plaintiff's filing of a proof of service upon defendant will be deemed good cause shown. (Fabillaran, J)
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/12/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request to Proceed IFP 2 is GRANTED; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is fu rther directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blueford v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Blueford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?